Adidas Denies Reconciliation With ADI King Is Still Under Trial.

< p > recently, media reports reported that Adidas had filed a reconciliation agreement against the king of Adidas, and the two sides have reached a settlement agreement.

Yesterday, Adidas told the Beijing News reporter that Adidas and Adi related cases are still under trial, and the agreement has not been finalized.

< /p >

< p > a few days ago, media reports said that Adidas filed a complaint against the king of Adidas, and the two sides have already reached a settlement. The settlement agreement includes two aspects. First, the defendant, Adi Wang, should not continue to use trademarks containing the logo of LOGO and "ADI" in the products, packaging and promotional materials. Two, since April 7th, all the shops of Adi Wang should not have the words of the triangle mark and "Adi Wang". If there is a breach of contract, they must pay 3 million yuan.

< /p >

< p > for this, Adidas related responsible person told the Beijing News reporters yesterday that Adidas and Adi related cases are still under trial, and the agreement has not yet been finalized, making it more difficult to comment on the case.

< /p >

< p > it is reported that recently, some shops of Adi Wang have been informed that "a target=" _blank "href=" //www.sjfzxm.com/ "shoes" /a "and" Adi Wang Chinese characters "should be processed as soon as possible. After April, the shop sign can not have the Chinese character of" Adi Wang "and the black triangle.

< /p >

< p > data show that the ADI king was founded in 2006, and its annual profit has exceeded 100 million yuan, and there are about three thousand stores in the country.

< /p >

< p > background < /p >

< p > Adidas has been involved in litigation for more than five years, < /p >.

The way of litigation for P Adidas has lasted for five years.

< /p >

< p > August 2008, Adidas complained of the infringement of its trademark exclusive rights and unfair competition disputes by the ADI king, and took the individual owner of Adi Wang, Hua Zhu company, and bait sports mall of Yingkou economic and Technological Development Zone to Yingkou Central Academy.

< /p >

After P, the case was pferred to the Dalian intermediate people's court for trial in October 20, 2009, because of the objection raised by addi Wang. In April 2010, the first trial decision was made to reject all the claims of Adidas.

< /p >

During the period of < p >, in July 21, 2009, Adidas again filed a lawsuit in Wuhan intermediate people's Court of Hubei province.

< /p >

< p > in March this year, Adidas took the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the State Administration for Industry and commerce to the court.

In March 15th, the case was heard in a Beijing intermediate people's court.

On the same day, the judges said that the "ADI" trademark and the "Adidas" trademark did not constitute similar trademarks on similar commodities, and did not infringe Adidas's trade name rights.

As a third person, Adi Wang believes that the trademark of "ADI" and "Adidas" do not constitute similar trademarks. The trademark "Adidas" is a conjecture and has no definite meaning.

< /p >